Одну секунду
Что-то сучилось. Попробуйте еще раз.
Is wikipedia a reliable source смотреть последние обновления за сегодня на .
It's the go-to website for information on just about anything. But is the info on Wikipedia worth it's weight in megabytes? Trace has the answer and tells us about a new plan to up the accuracy of some of its most popular pages. Read More: UCSF First U.S. Medical School to Offer Credit For Wikipedia Articles 🤍 "UC San Francisco soon will be the first U.S. medical school at which medical students can earn academic credit for editing medical content on Wikipedia." Medical Students Can Now Earn Credit for Editing Wikipedia 🤍 "Starting this winter, medical students at the University of California San Francisco will be able to obtain academic credit from an unlikely source: Wikipedia." Using Wikipedia 🤍 "As a tool for scholarly research, Wikipedia can be either a grade-killer or a valuable friend, depending on who you ask and what you hope to accomplish using it. What is fairly certain is that your professor won't let you cite it in a scholarly research paper." Citing Wikipedia 🤍 Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources; some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citeable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative." Special Report Internet encyclopaedias go head to head 🤍 "Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds." Britannica attacks... and we respond. 🤍 Watch More: Are We All Internet Addicts? 🤍 Scientists Vs Internet Trolls 🤍 7 NEW Wonders Of the World: 🤍 DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily. Watch More DNews on TestTube 🤍 Subscribe now! 🤍 DNews on Twitter 🤍 Anthony Carboni on Twitter 🤍 Laci Green on Twitter 🤍 Trace Dominguez on Twitter 🤍 DNews on Facebook 🤍 DNews on Google+ 🤍 Discovery News 🤍
We've all been told that Wikipedia isn't a good source for research, but how can it have such high quality information and yet still be susceptible to user vandalism? Naturally, the answer involves robots. Whoopsy by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (🤍 Artist: 🤍
Wikipedia is making us all dumb and lazy. SUBSCRIBE: 🤍 FOLLOW ME: 🇨🇦Support me on Patreon! 🤍 🤖Join my Discord! 🤍 🇺🇸Follow me on Instagram! 🤍 🇨🇦Read my latest Washington Post columns: 🤍 🇨🇦Visit my Canada Website 🤍 Some music by: Craig Henderson- 🤍 ComradeF- 🤍 HASHTAGS: #wikipedia #rant #videoessay
I love Wikipedia! I even donated to it. But I won't donate again, now that I've learned how BIASED Wikipedia has become. ———— To make sure you see the new weekly video from Stossel TV, sign up here: 🤍 ———— No right-leaning outlets, Fox News Politics, the Daily Wire, the Daily Caller, etc… is considered “reliable” by Wikipedia. None. But even some of the most extreme leftist outlets get a "reliable" badge like “Jacobin," a self-described SOCIALIST outlet. Vox, Buzzfeed News, and Slate are also deemed “reliable” by Wikipedia. Editors may base stories on their reporting. Why did Wikipedia become so biased? Veteran Wikipedian Jonathan Weiss tells me that the site, like academia, has been captured by leftists. Some Wikipedia administrators even brag on their profiles, "this user is a socialist." Another put up images idolizing communist murderers Che Guevara and Vladimir Lenin. These administrators make final decisions about what counts as “reliable," and what goes on Wikipedia. That’s why for years, Wiki's "communism" page made NO mention of the millions killed by that ideology. US border facilities are listed under "concentration camps,” on the same page as Wikipedia’s holocaust facilities. Can we fix this? Wikipedia is supposed to be a site that "anyone can edit," so I made an edit. You can find out what happened in the video above.
Free Civic Online Reasoning lessons, assessments and videos are available at 🤍 You might have heard that you can’t trust anything on Wikipedia. If that’s the case, then why do professional fact checkers often use it? In this video, we break down the basics of how to use Wikipedia wisely. Based on research with professional fact checkers, the Civic Online Reasoning curriculum from the Stanford History Education Group provides resources to help students become better consumers of digital information.
An apalling example of of how nitpickers "improve" science articles. Follow also my backup channel at 🤍
Wikipedia is good resource... or is it? Vaush answers this age-old question. Disclaimer: This channel is run by a fan and is not affiliated with Vaush source: 🤍 #vaush #clip ✨✨
See below for a number of resources and tools. If you enjoyed the video on wikipedia being a reliable source, please take a moment and give us a thumbs up on the video. Also, subscribe to our channel to get more videos from us you can also hit the bell to be notified when new videos are released. MY TOP RECOMMENDATION TO MAKE A FULL-TIME $$ ONLINE 🤍 FREE EBOOK - AFFILIATE MARKETING IN 7 SIMPLE STEPS 🤍 FREE EBOOK - 19 BOX DESTRUCTION IDEAS FOR BUSINESS & LIFE 🤍 TOOLS AND RESOURCES I PERSONALLY RECOMMEND 🤍 MAKE CASH FOR CLICKING A BUTTON VIA ONLINE PURCHASES (ebates) 🤍 TEXT MESSAGE MARKETING COMPANY WE USE 🤍 START YOUR OWN WEBSITE WITH BLUEHOST 🤍 ONLY WORDPRESS THEME WE LOVE (DIVI) 🤍 EMAIL MARKETING ONLY 🤍 EMAIL MARKETING, LANDING PAGES, AND MARKETING AUTOMATION 🤍 TOP TOOL FOR MARKETING FUNNELS: 🤍 CREATE BEAUTIFUL LANDING PAGES: 🤍 YOUTUBE TOOL TO INCREASE YOUR EXPOSURE: 🤍 DISCOUNT TO MY FACEBOOK MARKETING COURSE ON UDEMY 🤍 DISCOUNT TO MY 10 BEST ONLINE MARKETING STRATEGIES COURSE ON UDEMY (USE CODE 'BOXDESTROYER' FOR DISCOUNT) 🤍 GET PAID BY YOUR FANS FOR BEING CREATIVE 🤍 FIVERR - GET 20% OFF YOUR FIRST ORDER 🤍 GET A FREE STOCK WITH ROBINHOOD 🤍 TRADE CASH SEAMLESSLY WITH FRIENDS 🤍 GET A BONUS FOR USING CAPITAL ONE 🤍 $55 TOWARDS YOUR FIRST AIRBNB STAY 🤍 CONNECT WITH ME ONLINE 🤍 🤍 GET A DESTROY THE BOX T-SHIRT 🤍 Disclaimer: some of the links above are either affiliate links or send you to resources with possible affiliate links. This means that if you use these links that I'll make a small commission for referring you to the product/service (you still pay the same price, or possibly even get a better deal). #destroythebox #brooksconkle #destroytheboxwithbrooks
Let's talk about Wikipedia. Wikipedia is often maligned by teachers and twitter trolls alike as an unreliable source. And yes, it does sometimes have major errors and omissions, but Wikipedia is also the Internet's largest general reference work and as such an incredibly powerful tool. Today we'll discuss using Wikipedia for good - to help us get a birds-eye view of content, better evaluate information with lateral reading, and find trustworthy primary sources. Special thanks to our partners from MediaWise who helped create this series: The Poynter Institute The Stanford History Education Group (sheg.stanford.edu) Follow MediaWise and their fact-checking work across social: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 MediaWise is supported by Google. Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at 🤍 Thanks to the following Patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever: Eric Prestemon, Sam Buck, Mark Brouwer, Naman Goel, Patrick Wiener II, Nathan Catchings, Efrain R. Pedroza, Brandon Westmoreland, dorsey, Indika Siriwardena, James Hughes, Kenneth F Penttinen, Trevin Beattie, Satya Ridhima Parvathaneni, Erika & Alexa Saur, Glenn Elliott, Justin Zingsheim, Jessica Wode, Kathrin Benoit, Tom Trval, Jason Saslow, Nathan Taylor, Brian Thomas Gossett, Khaled El Shalakany, SR Foxley, Yasenia Cruz, Eric Koslow, Caleb Weeks, Tim Curwick, D.A. Noe, Shawn Arnold, Malcolm Callis, Advait Shinde, William McGraw, Andrei Krishkevich, Rachel Bright, Jirat, Ian Dundore Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - 🤍 Twitter - 🤍 Tumblr - 🤍 Support Crash Course on Patreon: 🤍 CC Kids: 🤍
Is wikipedia a reliable source? Of all things to get triggered over, this caused some people to post they were unsubscribing to the channel. Yeah, taking Qanon "drops" are a credible source, but professional news agencies with teams of reporters, fact checkers and editors, no, that's all fake and scripted.
Freddie Sayers meets Larry Sanger. Listen to the podcast version: 🤍 Read the full article here: 🤍 Chances are, if you’ve ever been on the internet, you’ve visited Wikipedia. It is the world’s fifth largest website, pulling in an estimated 6.1 billion followers per month and serves as a cheat sheet for almost any topic in the world. So great is the online encyclopaedia’s influence is so great that it is the biggest and “most read reference work in history”, with as many as 56 million editions. But the truth about this supposedly neutral purveyor of information is a little more complex. Historically, Wikipedia has been written and monitored by a community of volunteers who collaborated and contested competing claims with one another. In the words of Wikipedia’s co-founder, Larry Sanger who spoke to Freddie Sayers on LockdownTV, these volunteers would “battle it out”. This battle of ideas on Wikipedia’s platform formed a crucial part of the encyclopaedia’s commitment to neutrality, which according to Sanger, was abandoned after 2009. In the years since, on issues ranging from Covid to Joe Biden, it has become increasingly partisan, primarily espousing an establishment viewpoint that increasingly represents "propaganda". This, says Sanger, is why he left the site in 2007, describing it as “broken beyond repair”. Follow UnHerd on social media: Twitter: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 #wikipedia #covid19 #bias
In this video we will examine Wikipedia. Can it really be trusted? Can you use it as a basis for your personal study? We will read a few passages in English, Italian and Japanese and I will translate them all for you and we will compare the same pages to see if we reach the same conclusions. At the beginning what you see is my personal nerd room, a small room in my home which works as a time machine to my past where I keep all the things which belong to my teenage years. Follow me on my social networks: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 Music: intro ES_Knights Templar 1 - Johannes Bornlöf outro ES_Knights Templar 2 - Johannes Bornlöf
Wikipedia Day is an occasion to celebrate Wikipedia's birthday. On 15 January 2001, two American entrepreneurs-Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger launched an online encyclopedia.It was called Wikipedia. Despite much criticism early on about inaccuracies, it has gone on to be hugely successful. Know so many interesting fact about wikipedia. Wikipedia’s Main Page has always been its most viewed, followed by Special: Search and Special: Random. People says Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. तेरा तुझको अर्पण के लिए यहां क्लिक करें - 🤍 Install The Lallantop Android App: 🤍 Follow us on: 🤍 Like The Lallantop on Facebook: 🤍 Follow The Lallantop on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Futkar on YouTube for Short videos: 🤍 Follow Latak on Instagram: 🤍 For advertisements e-mail us at: Ads🤍thelallantop.com Produced By: The Lallantop Edited By: Varun
Henry cavill
This question is asked so many times by my students I thought I'd share with you an analogy I often use, hope it helps!
These are all real.
Welcome to ‘therefore solve it now’ In this tutorial, you will learn about How reliable is Wikipedia as a source of information ? So, watch the video till the end and enjoy it. Don’t forget to subscribe and comment below in the box. Thanks for watching - We are here for sharing our knowledge, thoughts, researches, ideology, and own creations for you. I hope you understand and enjoy every single effort. Subscribe to, therefore, solve it now channel and click on the bell icon so that all videos of solve it now are easily available to you. Thank you. Disclaimer: The content in this video is strictly for educational and informational purposes only. Any video may have a slight mistake, viewers should always do their own research before making a decision. This video does not contain anything that is harmful or something that doesn’t want to be on YouTube. © this video follows the laws of YouTube Photo & Video Credits: 🤍wikipedia.org 🤍
Popularity and reliability assessment of sources in references of Wikipedia in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. Website: 🤍 Chrome extension: 🤍 Research: 🤍
Check out the full episode on our channel!!! We are three teachers from London, UK talking all things teaching and beyond! REAL TALK FROM REAL TEACHERS!!! 👇CHECK OUT OUR SOCIALS BELOW👇 ✅ 🤍 ✅YOUTUBE: teacherz from da hood ✅TIKTOK: 🤍teacherzfromdahood ✅INSTAGRAM: 🤍teacherzfromdahood REAL TALK FROM REAL TEACHERS!!!
NOTE: I did not edit that Wikipedia page. Also, I don't think we're getting Flipnote 3D anytime soon, USA and Europe. Music used: Ren & Stimpy Production Music - Valse Moderne Death Note OST - Death Note Theme
#WebDeveloper #WebDevelopment #WebsiteDesign #WebDesign #Web #Website #Design #SEO #SearchEngineOptimization #SmallBusiness #Business #DigitalMarketing #Shorts . . Shoot to Thrill Media is dedicated to building and growing any business's online presence through web development and strategic marketing services. . To put it simply, we’re a team of web developers with a passion for business. But not just any business. YOUR business. We’ve assembled a team of designers, developers, and business management experts in one place to offer you solutions to all your online needs in one place. At Shoot To Thrill Media, we’re all about the experience. We design simple, compelling, and functional websites that make it easy for users to quickly find exactly what they’re looking for when they arrive at your site and then convert them into paying customers. It’s about creating an online experience that transforms users into followers, customers into ambassadors. We do this by listening to you, understanding your target audience, and putting our extensive online knowledge to work on a plan that will improve your business goals and change the way you think about the potential of the internet. Oh, and if you’re wondering, we’re mobile-first. It’s not just the way of the future. It’s the way of right now. Visit us online 👉 🤍 Follow us on Instagram 👉 🤍 Like us on Facebook 👉 🤍 Follow us on TikTok 👉 🤍
This video is about Wikipedia
Kirkwood Smart showcases collective knowledge at Kirkwood Community College in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. In the "Is Wikipedia reliable?" episode, college students, staff, and faculty rate how reliable they consider Wikipedia to be and share how they use it in the context of their lives and research assignments. Would you cite Wikipedia as a resource? Why or why not? How do you check your research resources? Post a comment or video response and share your smarts. For more resources and study tips, visit the Kirkwood Library Blog: 🤍 Series created by Nicole Forsythe, Kate Hess, Matt Murphy, and Clarity Guerra Kirkwood Media Creative Commons Attribution
This entire library of free information known as Wikipedia is often thought of as not a credible source for any type of research. Well today, I show how and why Wikipedia should be used as a credible and trustworthy source. -Do you like videos like these? Like the video, comment what you thought of it, and subscribe here: 🤍 -Join my discord, The Cool Kids! 🤍 -Join the subreddit r/Fighterchef: 🤍 -Background music: “Perlude” (Track 3 in “Jackpot”) by TheFatRat -Outro Song: Track: Valence - Infinite [NCS Release] Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds Watch: 🤍 Download/Stream: 🤍
How reliable is Wikipedia for History?
No. -Music used- Divider by Chris Zabriskie 🤍 Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International— CC BY 4.0 🤍 Music promoted by Audio Library 🤍 Hip Hop Rap Instrumental (Crying Over You) by Chris Morrow 4 🤍 Creative Commons — Attribution 3.0 Unported— CC BY 3.0 🤍 Music promoted by Audio Library 🤍 Feral Chase by Kevin MacLeod Download link: 🤍 Available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
It's a question that is asked in almost every classroom: Is Wikipedia a reliable source? This short documentary examines the pros and cons of Wikipedia through the opinions of both teachers and students of Edmeston Central School. It also analyzes the idea that Wikipedia is a sign of our times. Directed by: Allen Wengert
The game I'm playing is called Agarpaper.io and you can play it here: 🤍
You may know that anyone can edit Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia. But that does not mean people can write anything they want. Thousands of volunteers help ensure information added to the site is accurate and comes from verifiable sources. Watch to learn more. The Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization behind Wikipedia and other free knowledge projects, created “A Wiki Minute”, a series of videos that answer this and other frequently asked questions, in only a minute. Have another minute? Discover how Wikipedia works: 🤍 #AWikiMinute #Wikipedia #OpenTheKnowledge
A quick look at what makes Wikipedia work and what made it one of the most visited sites on the internet. MERCH: 🤍 PATREON: 🤍 REDDIT: 🤍 TWITTER: 🤍 DISCORD: 🤍 Download Wikipedia: 🤍 Sources: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 Music: "Omission" by Huma-Huma "Talkies" by Huma-Huma "Pas de Deux" by Bird Creek "Nighttime Stroll" by E's Jammy Jams #Wikipedia #Encyclopedia #Internet #Knowledge
Wikipedia Unreliable Source Supreme Court | Wikipedia vs Supreme Court Supreme court warning against wikipedia Wikipedia vs Supreme Court Supreme Court vs Wikipedia WHY Supreme Court HATE Wikipedia | Wikipedia Fact or Fiction | Supreme Court Warning | Legal Gurukul Wikipedia: Fact or Fiction? Why I hate Wikipedia wikipedia fact or fiction Forget about Wikipedia in Legal Matters Wikipedia is Biased & Unreliable Is Wikipedia a Credible Source? Is Wikipedia Actually Credible? Why I hate Wikipedia (and you should too!) Can you Trust Wikipedia? Wikipedia Is A BIASED & Unreliable Source Of Informati Using Wikipedia as a source Subscribe - 🤍 For Legal Queries Email ID - adv.piyushmittal🤍gmail.com Talk to Me (Callme4 App) ID - legalgurukul🤍cm4 Judgement Link Hewlett Packard Vs Commissioner of Customs 🤍 #wikipedia #supremecourt #legalgurukul #advocatepiyushmittal #legal #law Other social links Youtube - 🤍 Facebook - 🤍 website - Legalgurukul.career-boosters.com Email - info🤍legalgurukul.career-boosters.com (Sponsorship & Business) Gmail - adv.piyushmittal🤍gmail.com (Legal Queries) Thanks for Watching...Sharing...Subscribing.....Legal Gurukul Regards, Advocate Piyush Mittal, LLB. LLM Founder - Legal Gurukul Disclaimer: The Channel is a platform to educate general public in need of legal information. Videos only contain general and legal information on law. It is not professional legal advice and should not be construed as such. This is only dissemination of general information on law.
Is Wikipedia a reliable source? What information can actually be published on Wikipedia? We try to answer these questions by explaining the basic principles of the neutrality & reliability of sources used when editing an article on Wikipedia. This video was produced in cooperation with Wikimedia Germany. Authors: Elisabeth Mandl Denis Schröder Ilya Kompasov Theresa Sieder
.svg){kind=small}
