Source of wikipedia смотреть последние обновления за сегодня на .
We are: 🤍 Henry Cavill answers some questions about Immortals and Man of Steel in this brief Comic-Con Interview. Tarsem Singh answers a question too... Party on Twitter: 🤍 Check-out & Bookmark our Channel for Playlists! Disclaimer: We do not own this interview or the rights to it. We thank IGN Movies for making this interview. Source: 🤍
It's the go-to website for information on just about anything. But is the info on Wikipedia worth it's weight in megabytes? Trace has the answer and tells us about a new plan to up the accuracy of some of its most popular pages. Read More: UCSF First U.S. Medical School to Offer Credit For Wikipedia Articles 🤍 "UC San Francisco soon will be the first U.S. medical school at which medical students can earn academic credit for editing medical content on Wikipedia." Medical Students Can Now Earn Credit for Editing Wikipedia 🤍 "Starting this winter, medical students at the University of California San Francisco will be able to obtain academic credit from an unlikely source: Wikipedia." Using Wikipedia 🤍 "As a tool for scholarly research, Wikipedia can be either a grade-killer or a valuable friend, depending on who you ask and what you hope to accomplish using it. What is fairly certain is that your professor won't let you cite it in a scholarly research paper." Citing Wikipedia 🤍 Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources; some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citeable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative." Special Report Internet encyclopaedias go head to head 🤍 "Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds." Britannica attacks... and we respond. 🤍 Watch More: Are We All Internet Addicts? 🤍 Scientists Vs Internet Trolls 🤍 7 NEW Wonders Of the World: 🤍 DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily. Watch More DNews on TestTube 🤍 Subscribe now! 🤍 DNews on Twitter 🤍 Anthony Carboni on Twitter 🤍 Laci Green on Twitter 🤍 Trace Dominguez on Twitter 🤍 DNews on Facebook 🤍 DNews on Google+ 🤍 Discovery News 🤍
This screencast shows two ways of citing wikipedia for APA reference lists.
I love Wikipedia! I even donated to it. But I won't donate again, now that I've learned how BIASED Wikipedia has become. ———— To make sure you see the new weekly video from Stossel TV, sign up here: 🤍 ———— No right-leaning outlets, Fox News Politics, the Daily Wire, the Daily Caller, etc… is considered “reliable” by Wikipedia. None. But even some of the most extreme leftist outlets get a "reliable" badge like “Jacobin," a self-described SOCIALIST outlet. Vox, Buzzfeed News, and Slate are also deemed “reliable” by Wikipedia. Editors may base stories on their reporting. Why did Wikipedia become so biased? Veteran Wikipedian Jonathan Weiss tells me that the site, like academia, has been captured by leftists. Some Wikipedia administrators even brag on their profiles, "this user is a socialist." Another put up images idolizing communist murderers Che Guevara and Vladimir Lenin. These administrators make final decisions about what counts as “reliable," and what goes on Wikipedia. That’s why for years, Wiki's "communism" page made NO mention of the millions killed by that ideology. US border facilities are listed under "concentration camps,” on the same page as Wikipedia’s holocaust facilities. Can we fix this? Wikipedia is supposed to be a site that "anyone can edit," so I made an edit. You can find out what happened in the video above.
Free Civic Online Reasoning lessons, assessments and videos are available at 🤍 You might have heard that you can’t trust anything on Wikipedia. If that’s the case, then why do professional fact checkers often use it? In this video, we break down the basics of how to use Wikipedia wisely. Based on research with professional fact checkers, the Civic Online Reasoning curriculum from the Stanford History Education Group provides resources to help students become better consumers of digital information.
Let's talk about Wikipedia. Wikipedia is often maligned by teachers and twitter trolls alike as an unreliable source. And yes, it does sometimes have major errors and omissions, but Wikipedia is also the Internet's largest general reference work and as such an incredibly powerful tool. Today we'll discuss using Wikipedia for good - to help us get a birds-eye view of content, better evaluate information with lateral reading, and find trustworthy primary sources. Special thanks to our partners from MediaWise who helped create this series: The Poynter Institute The Stanford History Education Group (sheg.stanford.edu) Follow MediaWise and their fact-checking work across social: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 MediaWise is supported by Google. Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at 🤍 Thanks to the following Patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever: Eric Prestemon, Sam Buck, Mark Brouwer, Naman Goel, Patrick Wiener II, Nathan Catchings, Efrain R. Pedroza, Brandon Westmoreland, dorsey, Indika Siriwardena, James Hughes, Kenneth F Penttinen, Trevin Beattie, Satya Ridhima Parvathaneni, Erika & Alexa Saur, Glenn Elliott, Justin Zingsheim, Jessica Wode, Kathrin Benoit, Tom Trval, Jason Saslow, Nathan Taylor, Brian Thomas Gossett, Khaled El Shalakany, SR Foxley, Yasenia Cruz, Eric Koslow, Caleb Weeks, Tim Curwick, D.A. Noe, Shawn Arnold, Malcolm Callis, Advait Shinde, William McGraw, Andrei Krishkevich, Rachel Bright, Jirat, Ian Dundore Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - 🤍 Twitter - 🤍 Tumblr - 🤍 Support Crash Course on Patreon: 🤍 CC Kids: 🤍
The Full Wiki gives you sentences similar to those in Wikipedia articles that you can cite in your essays.
This video is a explanation of how Wikipedia works, whether it is biased or not and whether or not you should be using it as a source for your projects. Patreon: 🤍 Subreddit: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 E-Mail Address: viki1999mail🤍gmail.com The song in the outro was produced by 08 (who gave me no way to credit them), you can listen to the whole remix on my second channel: 🤍 Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:56 What is Wikipedia and how does it work 7:46 Examples of Bias 17:41 So will I keep using it? 20:20 Conclusion Sources: Tweet about me 🤍 How Wikipedia works 🤍 Wikipedia’s accuracy 🤍 Video summing up the structure of Wikipedia 🤍 Ideological bias on Wikipedia 🤍 Japanese Wikipedia bias 🤍 Crowd sourced examples of bias in Wikipedia 🤍 🤍 Columbus sending slaves back to Spain 🤍 Conservapedia on Wikipedia 🤍 Conservapedia general information 🤍 Conservapedia on Wikipedia 2 🤍 Conservapedia on Wikipedia 3 🤍 Criticisms of Wikipedia 🤍 My latest video 🤍 Transcript: Hello everybody. If you watched any of my recent videos and had a look at the description or the comment sections, you will have seen one thing. Wikipedia. And lots of angry people who say I shouldn’t use it at a source. It’s gotten so bad that I added an angry disclaimer to my last descriptions because I was frustrated with what I saw as unproductive feedback. Among that was this one tweet which got more likes and retweets than I am comfortable with. It seems some people have serious issues with my choice of sources. So, I am making this video to explain what Wikipedia is, how it works, why it can be a bad source, examples of bias and whether I will keep using it despite all that. And yes, just to prove I can, this video will not cite Wikipedia at all. That being said, let’s start with, what is Wikipedia? Wikipedia is a free online encyclopaedia run by the Wikipedia foundation who are a non-profit organisation. The information on the different pages is added and edited by users. Anyone can make a change. Which seems like it is ripe for misinformation, but if someone makes a change without a citation that change will be overruled. There are volunteer administrators who more or less sign off on the changes people propose. There are unchecked changes on small articles but those are rare. And if the citation is missing then it will say “citation needed”, and there will be a disclaimer telling you that the information may not be reliable. Personally, I once tried to write a Wikipedia article on the new religion I invented, long story. It was immediately flagged by a bot and deleted by an admin. These admins have rights others don’t have, for example they can ban users if they behave badly or make bad faith edits, and if it’s an anonymous user they will ban their IP address. The administrators can also make a page protected. If we look at the page of world war two we can see this little padlock here which tells us this page is protected, meaning without an account you can’t change anything about it. And an account needs to be established before you can make changes. As you can imagine this is used on loads of pages to protect them from vandalism.
#AskAbhijit Episode 20, Question 21 WATCH FULL EPISODE: #AskAbhijit 20: Indian History | Abhijit Chavda ► 🤍 SUBSCRIBE ► 🤍 SHORT CLIPS CHANNEL ► 🤍 SUPPORT THE CHANNEL ►UPI (G-Pay/PhonePe/Paytm): abhijitchavda🤍icici ►PayPal: 🤍 ►Become A Member on YouTube: 🤍 JOIN #AbhijitChavda ★Discord: 🤍 ★Twitter: 🤍 ★Instagram: 🤍 ★Facebook: 🤍 ★Website: 🤍 ★Email Inquiries: inquiries.chavda🤍gmail.com #AskAbhijitPodcast ★Spotify: 🤍 ★Apple Podcasts: 🤍 ★Google Podcasts: 🤍 #AskAbhijitChavda #Abhijit #Chavda #AskAbhijitShow
Wikipedia is making us all dumb and lazy. SUBSCRIBE: 🤍 FOLLOW ME: 🇨🇦Support me on Patreon! 🤍 🤖Join my Discord! 🤍 🇺🇸Follow me on Instagram! 🤍 🇨🇦Read my latest Washington Post columns: 🤍 🇨🇦Visit my Canada Website 🤍 Some music by: Craig Henderson- 🤍 ComradeF- 🤍 HASHTAGS: #wikipedia #rant #videoessay
How to (properly) use Wikipedia as a source! Too many times I've seen people refer to the user-generated site as a primary (or in worse cases) sole source. That's simply not the case. A proper Wiki-page has references throughout the article called "footnotes" but most people do not investigate them further. Just needed to get this off my chest. It was an extremely cathartic experience. Back to my regular videos, which you can watch here: 🤍 #wikipedia Like me on Facebook! 🤍 Follow me on Twitter! 🤍 MUSIC Jim Yosef - Canary (furnished by NoCopyrightSounds) 🤍 • 🤍 • 🤍 • 🤍 • 🤍
Wikipedia is good resource... or is it? Vaush answers this age-old question. Disclaimer: This channel is run by a fan and is not affiliated with Vaush source: 🤍 #vaush #clip ✨✨
We've all been told that Wikipedia isn't a good source for research, but how can it have such high quality information and yet still be susceptible to user vandalism? Naturally, the answer involves robots. Whoopsy by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (🤍 Artist: 🤍
This video tutorial is going to show you how to cite in a Wikipedia article Don't forget to check out our site 🤍 for more free how-to videos! 🤍 - our feed 🤍 - join us on facebook 🤍 - our group in Google+ Wikipedia articles can be cited in different formats. These formats include American Psychological Association (APA) Style, Modern Language Association (MLA) style, Modern Humanities Research Association (MHRA) style, Chicago styles among others. In this video, we are going to show you how to cite Wikipedia in all available styles. Step #1 choose your intended article Choose the article that you intend to cite on Wikipedia. Step #2 Click on tool box and choose cite this page On the left hand of the page, on your toolbox, expand the menu. Click on the link that says 'cite this page.' Step #3 scroll down and select your preferred citation style You will be taken to a new page. Scroll down and select your preferred citation style. Step #4 copy citation and paste it on your article Copy the citation and paste it below your document or article that you are working on. The citation will act as a source of reference. And you are done citing an article in Wikipedia. Thanks for watching this video tutorial, Leave comments and ask your questions by our e-mail feedback🤍howtech.tv.That was Howtech dot TV tutorial. Thank you for watching!
Smart Student FREE Resources 🔽 SMART WRITERS MASTERCLASS 💻 🤍 SMART STUDENT FACEBOOK GROUP 📚 🤍 APA 7TH EDITION FORMATTING GUIDE 📝 🤍 ACADEMIC WRITING STARTER KIT 💼 🤍 STAY IN THE LOOP 📱 🤍 SHOP MY AMAZON FAVORITES FOR ONLINE SCHOOLING 🔻 👩🏼💻 Laptop Stand for MacBook: 🤍 👩🏼💻 Laptop Stand Collapsible for any laptop: 🤍 🔮 Essential Oil Diffuser: 🤍 👓 Blue Light Blocking glasses: 🤍 ⌨️ Wireless Keyboard: 🤍 🐭 Wireless Mouse: 🤍 💻 Macbook Pro: 🤍 ⎚ Desktop Monitor: 🤍 🎧 Airpod Pros: 🤍 🎧 Noise Cancelling Earmuffs 🤍 SHOP MY AMAZON FAVORITES FOR MY YOUTUBE BUSINESS🔻 📸 CAMERA GEAR Sony Camera: 🤍 Camera Lense (makes background blurry!): 🤍 🔊AUDIO/DESK: Rogue Microphone Wireless: 🤍 Lavalier Lapel Microphone (screen recordings): 🤍 💡 LIGHTING Softbox Studio Lights: 🤍 Profession LED lights (travel easy): 🤍 🎉 ACCESSORIES: Ultrawide Curved Monitor: 🤍 Camera Tripod: 🤍 Wireless Remote Control: 🤍 SD Card for 4K Videos: 🤍 🔗These links are affiliate links and help support the channel when used! ⏰ Time Stamps 00:00 Introduction 00:42 Do's & Don'ts 3:43 Demonstration POPULAR PLAYLISTS ⏩ → APA 7th Edition 🤍 → APA 7th Edition: Referencing and Citing 🤍 → Academic Writing Tutorials 🤍 → SMART Researching 🤍 → Literature review and annotated bibliography 🤍 → Paraphrasing: Turning your research into writing 🤍 CONTACT ME ✉️ support🤍mysmartstudent.com SMART Student Resources 🔻 🤍 Say hi on Social 📱 🤍
Wikipedia now boasts more than 5.7 million articles in English and millions more translated into other languages, all written by online volunteers. Errol Barnett talks to one editor who was named among Time Magazine’s most influential people on the internet. Watch "CBS This Morning" HERE: 🤍 Download the CBS News app on iOS HERE: 🤍 Download the CBS News app on Android HERE: 🤍 Like "CBS This Morning" on Facebook HERE: 🤍 Follow "CBS This Morning" on Twitter HERE: 🤍 Follow "CBS This Morning" on Instagram HERE: 🤍 Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! 🤍 Delivered by Norah O’Donnell, Gayle King, John Dickerson, and Bianna Golodryga, "CBS This Morning" offers a thoughtful, substantive and insightful source of news and information to a daily audience of 3 million viewers. The Emmy Award-winning broadcast presents a mix of daily news, coverage of developing stories of national and global significance, and interviews with leading figures in politics, business and entertainment. Check local listings for "CBS This Morning" broadcast times.
Wikipedia is not a source, but a great place to find sources! Look for the numbered brackets (e.g. ) to find the source wikipedia is using that supports a specific fact.
Teach your students to analyze Wikipedia articles
#Wikipedia #Gauche #Droite #Uraken Le Co-Fondateur de Wikipédia s'inquiète et dit ne plus faire confiance au site qu'il a crée. Il explique le grand problème de la neutralité de l'information et démontre que les sources de droite sont purement interdites sur les articles socio-politique. ♥ Amour, Bière et Câlin ♥ Sources : ♥ Video sur Wikipedia : 🤍 ♥ 🤍 ♥ 🤍 ♥ Playlist Dalibourdin Investigation : 🤍 ♥ Rejoignez cette chaîne pour bénéficier d'avantages exclusifs : 🤍 ♥ Tipee : 🤍 ♥ Twitter : 🤍 ♥ Discord : 🤍 ♥ TikTok : 🤍 ♥ Facebook Groupe : 🤍 ♥ BitChute : 🤍 ♥ Twitch : 🤍 ♥ La communauté Trials : 🤍 -
An apalling example of of how nitpickers "improve" science articles. Follow also my backup channel at 🤍
Freddie Sayers meets Larry Sanger. Listen to the podcast version: 🤍 Read the full article here: 🤍 Chances are, if you’ve ever been on the internet, you’ve visited Wikipedia. It is the world’s fifth largest website, pulling in an estimated 6.1 billion followers per month and serves as a cheat sheet for almost any topic in the world. So great is the online encyclopaedia’s influence is so great that it is the biggest and “most read reference work in history”, with as many as 56 million editions. But the truth about this supposedly neutral purveyor of information is a little more complex. Historically, Wikipedia has been written and monitored by a community of volunteers who collaborated and contested competing claims with one another. In the words of Wikipedia’s co-founder, Larry Sanger who spoke to Freddie Sayers on LockdownTV, these volunteers would “battle it out”. This battle of ideas on Wikipedia’s platform formed a crucial part of the encyclopaedia’s commitment to neutrality, which according to Sanger, was abandoned after 2009. In the years since, on issues ranging from Covid to Joe Biden, it has become increasingly partisan, primarily espousing an establishment viewpoint that increasingly represents "propaganda". This, says Sanger, is why he left the site in 2007, describing it as “broken beyond repair”. Follow UnHerd on social media: Twitter: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 #wikipedia #covid19 #bias
Wikipedia is more than just an online reference; it's also a great source of quick-check national-level data collated from the world's most important data publishers.
wikipedia ki secret trick wikipedia trick wikipedia par aese hatayen faltu ki chinje wikipedia par aese kare padai wikipedia ka istemal kaise karen how to use wikipedia how to remove unnecessary content on wikipedia content remove on wikipedia wikipedia trick wikipedia facts facts about wikipedia how to use wikipedia trick #shorts #wikipedia #freeTech
Popularity and reliability assessment of sources in references of Wikipedia in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. Website: 🤍 Chrome extension: 🤍 Research: 🤍
What’s up, Prepster! If you’re prepping for your SAT/ACT, check out 🤍 for the BEST SAT/ACT prep taught through sketch comedy videos! Thousands of students have laughed their score up to the 99th percentile. Check out our website for the BEST tips: 🤍 We post different content on our different social media handles, so make sure to follow us on all! Follow us on TikTok: 🤍 Follow us on Instagram: 🤍 Follow us on Facebook: 🤍 Don’t forget to hit those Like and Subscribe buttons so you can CRUSH your test!
We rarely used Wikipedia as a source, but when we do usually someone notes in the comment section "wikipedia is not a source". In this video we discuss the various aspect of using Wikipedia as source, especially since there is quite a difference among fields and of course professors as well. Of course, we also talk in general how to approach sources as well. »» SUPPORT MHV «« » patreon, see videos early (adfree) - 🤍 » subscribe star - 🤍 » paypal donation - 🤍 »» MERCHANDISE «« » teespring - 🤍 » SOURCES « Wikipedia? #WikipediaIsNotASource #Wikipedia #WikipediaAsSource
Full Playlist: 🤍 - - Watch more How to Use Internet Search & Web Browsers videos: 🤍 Share your expertise on a subject by writing about it for Wikipedia, the world's biggest encyclopedia. This multilingual, Web-based, free content encyclopedia already contains millions of articles, but there's always room for something new. Why not publish something by you? Step 1: Have the right topic Before you try to create an article, make sure you have an appropriate topic. Wikipedia wants unbiased, well-sourced information about subjects that are notable enough to appear in an encyclopedia. The site rejects articles that promote or publicize a business; advice – legal, medical or otherwise; instructional material; travel guides; and news items. Tip Get ideas for topics by typing WP:RA in the search box; a list of articles requested by others will appear. Step 2: Source your work Make sure you get the information for your article from a credible, reliable source. Material in books and newspapers is generally considered reliable; the musings of bloggers are not. And don't bother writing about yourself; it's considered a conflict of interest. Tip Detailed instructions on the proper way to cite sources can be found by typing WP:CITE into the search box and hitting "Go." Step 3: Conduct an internal search Make sure Wikipedia hasn't already published an article on your exact subject by typing it into the site's internal search engine. Search as many variations of the topic name as you can think of, including common misspellings of relevant terms. Tip Click "Search" to find Wikipedia articles that just mention your subject. Step 4: Google it Search the topic on Google to see if it finds any Wikipedia articles on your subject. Google sometimes picks up postings that Wikipedia's own search engine misses. Step 5: Sign up Become a registered user to submit an article without first gaining the site's approval. Having an account also means you can create a user profile, receive messages from other users, request notification for changes made to articles, and, of course, get credit for the articles you write. Click on "create an account" at the top right of any page. Tip If you'd prefer not to register, submit a proposal through Wikipedia's Articles for Creation, an online review process that provides feedback on your idea. Type WP:AFC in a Search box and hit "Go." Step 6: Practice writing Practice writing an article by composing a draft in the Sandbox, where you can familiarize yourself with the site's editing tools. Get there by typing WP:SB in the Search box and hitting, "Go." Click "Help" in the toolbox to the left of any page for guidance. Step 7: Enter the article Type your subject in a Search box and hit "Go." You've already determined that no page with that title exists. Click on your highlighted search entry. You'll be redirected to a blank page where you can begin writing your article. Tip Wikipedia editors may request more sources from you after reviewing your article. Step 8: Publish! When your article is finished, hit "Show Preview" to proofread your work and see how it will appear on the site. When you're ready to publish it, hit "Save Page." Congratulations! You're a Wikipedian! Did You Know? Wikipedia has published articles in more than 250 languages.
Today we take a look at Kiwix Serve. A .zim compatible web server: it allows you to deliver .zim files over the HTTP protocol within your local network – be it a University or your own house. Simply start Kiwix-Serve on your machine, and your content will be available for anybody through their web browser. Read more about Kiwix 🤍 Written Guide 🤍 Tags used in this video selfhosted, kiwix-serve, kiwix, self hosted wikipedia, install kiwix serve, homelab, geekedtv, self hosted, data hoarder, data hoarding, tutorial, thehomelabwiki, awesome selfhosted, docker tutorials
This is a short video about how the online information repository Wikipedia came into being. NOTE: This video is intended to be a very simple overview of the Wikipedia project. With that said, the video does gloss over Larry Sanger's contributions to Wikipedia, and it oversimplifies his reasons for leaving the project. As pointed out by Larry Sanger himself, Mr. Sanger did approve of, and support Wikipedia as a free, open source, online encyclopedia; however, he was critical of "certain aspects of the Wikipedia project." More information on Larry Sanger's role in Wikipedia's development, and his criticism of the model, can be found here: 🤍 More interesting stuff at: 🤍. ...or follow 🤍SurviveEnglish on Twitter
Learn how you can find sources and start college-level research by using Wikipedia. (Hartness Library CCV/Vermont Tech)
Wikipédia, Quora.. Tous ces sites permettent d'avoir du savoir ! Mais... peut-on VRAIMENT leur faire confiance ? Mon extension Chrome à installer ABSOLUMENT : 🤍 Mon INCROYABLE dernière vidéo ➡️ 🤍 🎥 Mon setup COMPLET (PC / Caméra / Autres) : 🤍 Si tu es descendu jusque-là, n'oublie pas de liker la vidéo, après tout, t'as bien cliqué sur "en voir plus", tu peux bien utiliser un clic de plus.... (Merci ❤️️)
Wikipedia asking for money? but why? . . - 🎧 Listen To My Podcast: #HustlewithManishShow On Ganna: 🤍 On Jiosaavn: 🤍 On Spotify: 🤍 On Apple iTunes: 🤍 ✅ Subscribe to my YouTube Channel to join in my Legacy. - INSTAGRAM: 🤍Mannparadox 🤍 . . #shorts #hustlewithmanish #wikipedia #businessnews #technews
A brief technical overview of how to create footnoted citations on Wikipedia
In order to qualify for a Wikipedia article, a topic must be notable. According to Wikipedia's criteria, a topic is notable if it "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." In short, you may be eligible for an article if there has been significant coverage about you in major news sources such as newspapers, magazines, television, and academic journals. These sources cannot be self-published material such as your blogs, personal or company websites, and press releases. Wikipedia also has strict rules against "original research." This simply means that every statement made in a Wikipedia article must be substantiated. So, before you can update an article about yourself or your company with new information, the statements you make on Wikipedia must be discussed in major news or academic publications. A quick way to gauge the notability of any subject is to ask the following questions: - Has the subject been featured in at least 5 credible national media sources such as Newspapers, Television, Magazines, or academic publications? - Has the subject won national or international prizes for excellence such as a Grammy, Oscar, Pulitzer Prize, Nobel Prize, etc.? If you answered YES to any of these questions, you may qualify for a Wikipedia entry. If you think you qualify for a Wikipedia article or if you have a question for WikiExperts send us a note to Inquiry🤍WikiExperts.us. Thanks for watching WikiExperts Answers.